Definition: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Revelation 17:2. It's a really important and somewhat unsettling verse. Here's an explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a scene of intense sexual activity – fornication – that’s happening among powerful figures who are leading the world. It suggests a significant breakdown in morality and order. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication…” This is the core of the idea. “Kings” here refers to rulers, leaders, and powerful figures who control nations and kingdoms. The word "fornication" means sexual intercourse outside of marriage – a serious transgression. “…and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.” This describes what happens as a result of this fornication. The “wine” represents something intoxicating, perhaps pleasure, or even something that encourages immoral behavior. The "inhabitants of the earth" – basically everyone on Earth – are affected by this intense activity. What does it mean in a broader sense? This verse is often interpreted as a symbolic representation of: Moral Decay: It suggests a decline in ethical standards and a loss of spiritual values within society. Political Corruption: Historically, some interpret it as a metaphor for political corruption – where leaders prioritize personal desires over the well-being of their people. The Rise of Evil: It can be seen as foreshadowing or a warning about the potential for evil to flourish when moral boundaries are blurred. Important Note: This is a complex verse, and different interpretations exist within religious communities. It's often used in a metaphorical way rather than being taken literally. Do you want me to: Explain another part of Revelation 17? Discuss the historical context of this verse? Explore different possible interpretations?